Ruben Verkuylen is an independent graphic designer who works and lives in The Hague and is part of the editorial staff of 1000 things. Ruben is mostly active in the cultural parts of the industry with BAKK - a platform for music, culture and night life - as a big part of his occupations. Currently Ruben is graduating at Graphic Design at the Royal Academy of Art.
Digital Data & Dreams
Imagine, you live in the 14th century, and somebody tells you the printing press will be a catalyst in a scientific revolution. You would probably think this person is exaggerating. You do understand the principle of reproduction and distribution of thought, that's not the problem. However, you can't imagine that such a simple thing as a change in medium can have such a profound impact.
The inability to understand the transition to a newer medium can have severe consequences. From the moment the printing press made its first appearance a new group of disadvantaged became apparent, the illiterate. This group was unable to read, spell and write and could therefore not interpret the new medium. For them the world became more and more a place they could not understand.
In the 21st century not only the illiterate are the ones that are unable to understand the new current medium. A new group is created, those who cannot understand an ever changing medium. With the arrival of the internet it becomes relevant to ask if a human being and the graphic designer can really cope with an ever such changing medium.
The modern illiterate
There is a new group of disadvantaged because of the nature of a developing or established medium. This, in essence, is what happens with every new medium, as it asks of its user to undergo a process of unlearning and learning. Besides vocal language, people had to learn how to interpret written language, they had to unlearn to write the same as they spoke, not to mention any refinements that were expected along the way .
What happens if a new medium is introduced that is not only different from its predecessor but also constantly changing? The process of learning and unlearning becomes a constant state. Alvin Toffler wrote the following about this:
“The illiterate of the 21st century will not be those who cannot read and write, but those who cannot learn, unlearn, and relearn.”
If we take a look at which medium might be the biggest change for the printed word, the internet is likely to be picked. Our environment is more and more designed for quick communication in which we are hardly limited to geographical location; our social relations are maintained by platforms and applications, and the amount of people that use smartphones, tablets and laptops is growing exponentially. All developments largely dependent on the internet.
With our daily and sometimes even uninterrupted use we’d like to think that we also understand. We use a smartphone so we "are" on the internet, we use google so we use the internet. But do we truly understand what internet is? Is using applications that are on the internet the same as understanding? Maybe we are fooling ourselves, and maybe we are the new generation that does not understand its environment. And perhaps worse: we aren't even noticing it.
From solid to liquid
An important cause of if we do or do not understand the internet is most likely the wrong interpretation of its nature. Up until we had internet all our media was invariable, as soon as they were produced. A book, newspaper, flyer or poster: as soon as they are produced they are solid. The internet on the other hand is not solid at all. For example news-websites can add and change content at any moment of the day. If you look at a news website you merely see a snapshot of an ever changing image. But if internet knows no solid state which state does it have then? Maybe liquid?
In core the difference between solid and liquid is easily described, however it is very clearly defined by Zygmunt Bauman “[...] in simple language [...] liquids, unlike solids, cannot easily hold their shape. Fluids, so to speak, neither fix space nor bind time. While solids have clear spatial dimensions but neutralize the impact, and thus downgrade the significance, of time (effectively resist its flow or render it irrelevant), fluids do not keep to any shape for long and are constantly ready (and prone) to change it; and so for them it is the flow of time that counts, more than the space they happen to occupy: that space, after all, they fill but ‘for a moment’.”
Not only the visual qualities but also time plays an indispensable role. A picture of a liquid form needs a time indication, because when the picture is taken, the liquid form has already changed. A solid shape however is hardly affected by time. As easy as liquid shapes change they manoeuvre around solid shapes and hardly feel impact. They can 'flow', 'spill', 'run out', 'splash', 'pour over', 'leak', 'flood', 'spray', 'drip', 'seep' and 'ooze'. Even better, just as it takes energy to hold a liquid form stationary, it takes energy to make a solid form move.
The comparison between solid and liquid is highly relevant when we are talking about internet. The internet doesn't know the solidness as we have known in media up to now. The internet does not feel any friction when being moved: it flows from one side of the world towards the other in a fraction of a second. Images can be duplicated with a friction that is almost negligible. News-reports don't have a specific moment in time: they are only snapshots of a liquid form.
The underestimation of changes and their impact, and the wrong interpretation of the nature of the internet, can have profound effects, as Toffler indicated: the rise of a new generation that can't interpret the media around itself. Especially because of these factors it is very important to address a group that is extremely dependent on the medium of this time and its interpretation: the graphic designer.
The printing press was on its own nothing more than a technique; it was the human who by a (specific) implementation gave value to it. He duplicated documents, made books, made posters, flyers and derivatives. From this development the graphic designer evolved, a person who has the task to visualise a message in the media of its time.
Here arises a paradox: the graphic designer is rooted in history of solid forms, but it's his task to use the medium of nowadays which is mainly liquid. Because the medium is so different, omnipresent and growing, it is the graphic designer who should critically review himself. The graphic designer must go from solid (static) design towards liquid design. We shouldn't learn to write and read differently in order not to become subordinated; we need to learn a skill to handle the constantly changing state of our new media. This is not a simple task for a graphic designer, because he is inclined to think in terms of solidity, rules and grids. It is almost an inhumane transition. It is in our nature to think in heuristics in order to make our daily life manageable: who are and are not our friends, what I do and do not like, etc.
Maybe the transition to liquid design is still ungraspable and we should take a step back and realise that we underestimated the internet, it's nature and impact. Even language limits us.
Comprehending, grasping, materialising are conceivable descriptions of a change in thinking in which statements are still made in terms of solidity.
Factors like these make it an excellent task for a graphic designer to rove the internet in a visual way. By not only understanding it and holding it down but also by letting it 'flow', 'drip' and 'ooze'.
Liquid Design resulted out of his graduation project The New Public Space where he researches the interesting interaction between the rapidly changing media and graphic design which depends so heavily on it. The text is researched by Gilles and written together with Ruben Verkuylen.
Alvin Toffler, Rethinking the Future, London, 2008
Zygmunt Bauman, Liquid Modernity, Cambridge, 2000
Conversations and Encounters
Bigger systems and average benches
Could I write my name in the air with ketchup
One aim in life yet to fulfil - while ignoring its true feasibility - is to travel through space. The thought of floating in the vacuum and being something trifling in comparison to the black endlessness, where the earth is just the size of a marble, just blows my mind. I would love to know what a front crawl would feel like. Would I be able to write my name in the air with ketchup if I'm just swift enough?
However, an interview with Suni Williams put me right back on earth. Williams is an American astronaut who served two space missions for the International Space Station for over a year. In an interview with the BBC she told how daily life in space can be made bearable. What mattered most was to keep everything as ´regular´ as possible. She brushed her hair daily just as she would do at home, not that it mattered if it really looked good. She brought memorabilia with her, such as a pluche version of her Jack Russell terrier, and marshmallow cream so she could make what has been her favourite snack since she was a child.
But she also told that from such a distance - while trying to keep a daily life in space - issues on earth became trivial. Politics became less significant, and she felt more human than American. Not the news itself but the people concerning the issues became prominent in her thinking. This change of view together with the impact of daily life made me realise what works of art can sometimes achieve. They can be dissected into daily matters - which materials are being used, what is being depicted, what size it is and all the other (physical) proporties you would like to acknowledge. And at the same time - all of a sudden - you can be surrounded by a cocoon that holds you in safe zone from which you can behold phenomena from a distance. Launched into the air, unmarred by resistance, thoughts can be given space to wander. What really does really matter to me and what is of no concern at all? Who am I on this small crumb in a time span hardly worth mentioning? Sometimes thoughts jet by like a wind tunnel, sometimes they introduce themselves neatly one after the other like a job application. And then again you are kindly put back on the soil by the ordinariness of a projector or clay that makes sure you don't drift towards endlessness. You need the earthly and daily matters to survive from a distance and to overview the earth.
Maybe it will become affordable somewhere in the near future to do space travel and, on the way to the red planet, truly see the world for what it is, with my favorite shirt functioning as a reminder of the ´ordinary´. Until then I will settle for less, with James Turrell as my co-pilot.
Original interview with the BBC